| The U.S. Federal Maritime Commission requested
the Philippine Consulate of Los Angeles to advise the
Filipino American community to use lawfully licensed
international cargo moving companies. Such a request
from a federal agency is not surprising, after all,
Filipinos are among the most frequent sender of goods
and other personal via ocean transportation using a
corrugated container known as "balikbayan box".
In the past year alone, several millions of dollars
were generated from consumers who regularly send "balikbayan
box" to the Philippines.
The entities who transport these "balikbayan boxes"
are known in the shipping industry as Non Vessel Operating
Common Carriers(NVOCC). These NVOCC's are licensed as
Ocean Transport Intermediaries (OTI's). These OTI's
in turn use ocean cargo containers. The ocean cargo
containers are then filled up with balikbayan boxes
from several individual shippers and are dispatched
at an average of one or two per week depending on the
volume. To the consumers, these OTI's are known as "door
to door" cargo service. It is the OTI or the "door
to door" service provider that picks up the package
from the sender's home and delivers it right by the
beneficiary's doorstep in the Philippines. This "door
to door" service is pretty convenient for an average
consumer. It allows consumers to send packages regularly
without going out of their way. A consumer can just
call the OTI of his choice and schedule a pickup.
Moreover, the cost of renting an ocean container is
significantly reduced for an individual shipper because
the cost is distributed among all senders. It also saves
senders the trouble of having to deal tediously with
custom officials.
With such convenient way of sending 'balikbayan boxes',
why are things not perfect? it is because there were
instances of packages being lost or undelivered. There
can be several reasons for delivery failures or package
losses. Among the more common reasons are: lost at sea,
lost in warehouse during custom clearance or pilferage.
If a package is lost at sea, the Carriage of Goods
by Sea Act of 1936 (also known as COGSA) provides that
a package does not exceed $500.00 in the absence of
a declaration value. "Door to door" companies
usually say that a free insurance is provided as part
of their service; in reality however, they are required
by law to cover each package up to $500.00 in the event
of loss.
If the value of the goods sent exceeds $500.00, recovery
of the actual cost follows if the shipment is covered
with a valued inventory or packing list.
Another reason for undelivered packages is the intentional
"holding" by OTI's or "door to door"
companies. These "door to door" companies
claim that they held the packages because of unpaid
shipping cost. Consumers on the other hand insist that
payment had rendered. In the midst of such controversy,
it was found out by this writer that there are several
types of Ocean Cargo Service Providers that an ordinary
consumer will not be able to distinguish on the outset.
In addition to the OTI, there are co-loaders, sub-agents
and there are non-licensed operators.
The OTI is usually the legitimate lessee of the ocean
vessel container that will be used to load the packages.
The co-loaders are independent companies with their
own licenses. The co-loaders operate exactly like the
OTI's before the eyes of the consumers. They advertise
exactly the same service.
The difference is, shipment with a co-loader sometimes
takes a longer period because co-loaders can load packages
if the OTI cannot fill up the vessel container. Priority
is given to packages sent directly to the OTI.
The sub-agents on the other hand, are entities or individuals
who pick-up packages, issues invoices using an OTI's
or a co-loader's receipt but are independent from both.
These sub-agents present themselves to consumers as
authorized representatives.
Unknown to consumers, there are usually agreements
between these sub-agents and the OTI or co-loaders,
both known as principals, regarding independence and
limitation of liabilities.
Therefore, when these sub-agents fail to remit the
money paid by sender which is not uncommon, the Principals
will not ship the goods and will hold those goods in
their warehouses until payment is rendered. More often
than not, consumer have to make another payment to have
the goods shipped.
Those who cannot swallow the idea of having to pay
twice leave their packages to rot in the warehouse.
In the meantime, the sub-agent who collected the money
but did not remit the payment to the Principal is nowhere
to be found.
If you are one of those who use "door to door
cargo" service, it might help for you to know that
those "door to door" companies are regulated
by the Federal Maritime Commission. Applicable regulations
are provided by the Shipping Act of 1988 and the Coast
Guard Authorization Act of 1998.
Under those provisions, the Federal Maritime Commission
requires cargo companies to be duly licensed, to post
a $75,000 bond to cover judgment awards in the event
of insolvency or dissolution. Cargo companies are also
required to publish tariff rates in order to operate
legitimately. The disadvantage of shipping with a cargo
company that is not legitimately operating is the difficulty
of seeking recovery in the event of loss or wrongdoing.
A legitimate cargo company posted a bond, thus recovery
remains possible even after dissolution or insolvency.
On the other hand, the unlicensed illegitimate cargo
companies who never posted a bond can just dissolve
their existing company, open a new cargo service under
a new name and get away with their liabilities yet remaining
in operation. In the meantime, consumers who lost packages
or whose payments were never remitted are left without
any remedy.
Unfortunately, not all entities or individuals who
are actively providing "door to door" service
are operating in accordance with the regulations of
the Federal Maritime Commission. A number of them do
not have the necessary license. Some of them have their
own corporate names and city permits but are operating
illegally as far as the licensing and bonding requirements
of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Some have the license but failed to post the required
bond making their license invalid. Others are bonded
and licensed but failed to publish tariff rates. Publication
of a tariff rate does not affect the consumer directly,
but in the event that the entity is audited by the FMC,
the erring entity may be subjected to severe penalties
which could ultimately lead to a closure. Upon closure,
it becomes difficult to recover packages, demand proper
delivery or seek recovery.
To make sure that a cargo service provider is duly
licensed and bonded, a listing is provided by the Federal
Maritime Commission web site at www.fmc.gov and selecting
the "view carrier" list. In the absence of
an access to a website, it is good to know that 46 CFR
Section 515.31 requires "door to door" companies
to have their names and license number imprinted on
their stationeries and billing forms or receipts that
are issued to customers. If you are from Los Angeles,
you may also contact Mr. Oliver Clark, the FMC Los Angeles
Area representative or Mr. Michael Moneck at (206) 553-0221
if you are from the Seattle area.
So, next time you send your "balikbayan box"
through a "door to door" company, it may be
a good idea to look at your receipt and see if there
is a license number printed. If there is, it may be
worth checking the status of that number just to make
sure that it is active , not suspended or revoked.
Better yet, ask the provider whether they are licensed
and bonded. By dealing with legitimate cargo companies,
you can be assured that a remedy is feasible in the
event the "balikbayan box" you've work so
hard for does not reach the doors of your relatives
who are eagerly waiting back home.
About the author:
Alma Luna-Reyes currently publishes a newsmagazine.
She used to write a column for Philippine Post and Philippine
Times.She uses the pen name Moon King or S.M. King.
When asked how she ended with that pen name, she said
it is the English version of her name. She has a Bachelor
of Arts Degree in Philosophy from the Ateneo de Manila
University. She recently completed her Doctorate in
Jurisprudence in a California University. She can be
reached at almareyes@aol.com. This article was printed
with her permission.
|